Obviously, there’s still a long way to go to protect people from efforts to manipulate them with willfully false information online. This morning, Google is highlighting its own fact-checking efforts in News and Search, while a new report calls out Bing as a hotbed of misinformation and disinformation.

Google touts expanding fact-checking. The company said that “fact checks appear more than 11 million times a day in Search results globally and in Google News in five countries (Brazil, France, India, U.K. and U.S.). There’s also a dedicated search tool for fact checking that anyone can access.

Google also says that it’s working with a variety of organizations to provide more “context” for people to help them evaluate content in Google News or in Search results. The company illustrates this with an example from a search result for the query “did vaccines cause measles outbreak in Samoa.”

Google fact-checking markup in the SERP

The result, which is relatively far down the page, indicates that the story is “false” and has been checked by AFP. Users can click-through to the AFP fact check for themselves. Google goes on to say in its blog post that it’s trying to find “new models to support the long-term sustainability of the fact-checking field” (read: it doesn’t want to subsidize it forever).

Google’s effort to support fact-checking is laudable but doesn’t go far enough. Stories that have been determined to be false through credible third-party fact-checking should either be severely demoted or removed entirely from the SERP.

Bing disinformation much worse than Google. Bing has largely been spared all the criticism that Google and Facebook have suffered over “fake news.” However, a new report and analysis from the Stanford Cyber Policy Center found that Bing’s SERPs are filled with bad and dubious information much more often than Google’s.

According to the report, “Bing returns disinformation and misinformation at a significantly higher rate than Google does. Across the top 50 results for 12 separate queries (a total of 600 results), Bing returned at least 125 sources of disinformation and misinformation, while Google returned 13.”

Other verbatim findings critical of Bing include:

• Bing directs users to conspiracy-related content, even if they aren’t explicitly looking for it.
• Bing shows users Russian propaganda at a much higher rate than Google does.
• Bing places student-essay sites—sites where students post or sell past papers — in its top 50 results for certain queries.
• Bing dredges up gratuitous white-supremacist content in response to unrelated queries.

The complete findings and methodology are documented here.

Why we care. First, there’s the obvious issue of not allowing the internet to become a vehicle for manipulation of populations and political outcomes. But in the more specific world of online marketing, bad information and false content in SERPs erodes trust. I would argue we have a crisis of trust online right now and marketers need to be building trust to ensure success and long-term value. Without credibility and trust, billions of dollars in brand advertising will be entirely wasted.